Portfolio concentration
89%
Top three share
Shows whether the organization is driven by one breakout repo or several visible projects.
Breadth
29 repos
Visible snapshot
23 repositories updated in the last 90 days.
Leading language
C
Portfolio mix
C (20), Rust (3), Dockerfile (2)
Average size
27
Stars per repository
Useful for distinguishing one flagship-heavy publisher from a repeatable portfolio.
89%
of the visible star count comes from this organization's top three repositories.
27
stars per repository in this same snapshot.
C
is the most common language here, with 23 repositories updated in the last 90 days.
Why this rank
This organization stands out because one flagship repo drives 64% of its visible star count.
Organization pages work best when you separate portfolio breadth from flagship concentration. In wolfSSL's case, the visible top three repositories account for about 89% of total stars in this snapshot, which helps explain whether the organization is known for one breakout project or for a broader repeatable portfolio.
The dominant language mix here is C (20), Rust (3), Dockerfile (2). That makes this page useful not just for popularity checks, but also for seeing what technical shape an organization's public ecosystem actually has.
| # | Repository | Language | Stars |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | wolfssl/wolfip Lightweight TCP/IP stack with no dynamic memory allocations | C | 505 |
| 2 | wolfssl/wolfGuard | C | 124 |
| 3 | wolfssl/wolfCOSE A fast, portable, and lightweight COSE + CBOR implementation for embedded systems. Supports PQC, FIPS 140-3, DO-178, and MISRA C. Powered by wolfSSL. | C | 76 |
| 4 | wolfssl/wolfHAL wolfHAL is a lightweight hardware abstraction layer for embedded targets written in C | C | 20 |
| 5 | wolfssl/rustls-wolfcrypt-provider Code that lets you use wolfcrypt as crypto provider for rustls. | Rust | 15 |
| 6 | wolfssl/wolfssl-examples-stm32 wolfSSL examples for STM32 | C | 10 |
| 7 | wolfssl/nxp-appcodehub wolfSSL NXP examples for AppCodeHub | C | 6 |
| 8 | wolfssl/wolfPSA | C | 5 |
| 9 | wolfssl/wolfGuard-boringtun fork of boringtun to do wolfguard and wireguard using wolfcrypt | Rust | 4 |
| 10 | wolfssl/wolftpm-examples wolfTPM examples repository | C | 4 |
| 11 | wolfssl/Microchip This repository contains commercially licensed wolfSSL products for use on Microchip platforms. | C | 3 |
| 12 | wolfssl/wolfPKCS11-examples Examples for wolfPKCS11 | Dockerfile | 3 |
| 13 | wolfssl/wolfCert C library for client-side certificate lifecycle management | C | 2 |
| 14 | wolfssl/simulators | Rust | 2 |
| 15 | wolfssl/wolfssl-containers wolfSSL based Docker containers | Shell | 2 |
| 16 | wolfssl/libgpg-error | C | 2 |
| 17 | wolfssl/gnutls-wolfssl Port of wolfSSL into gnutls | C | 2 |
| 18 | wolfssl/libgcrypt-wolfssl Experimental port of wolfSSL into libgcrypt | C | 2 |
| 19 | wolfssl/github-actions | 2 | |
| 20 | wolfssl/Microchip-wolfhsm This repository contains commercially licensed wolfHSM library code for use on Microchip platforms. | C | 0 |
| 21 | wolfssl/Microchip-wolfboot This repository contains commercially licensed wolfBoot library code for use on Microchip platforms. | C | 0 |
| 22 | wolfssl/Microchip-wolfmqtt This repository contains commercially licensed wolfMQTT library code for use on Microchip platforms. | C | 0 |
| 23 | wolfssl/Microchip-wolfssh This repository contains commercially licensed wolfSSH library code for use on Microchip platforms. | C | 0 |
| 24 | wolfssl/Microchip-wolfssl This repository contains commercially licensed wolfSSL SSL/TLS library code for use on Microchip platforms. | C | 0 |
| 25 | wolfssl/wolfGlass wolfGlass is one toolkit that makes software transparency artifacts for all wolfSSL products. The artifacts are the SBOM, the security advisory, the VEX, and the build provenance. | Python | 0 |
| 26 | wolfssl/wolfDen | C | 0 |
| 27 | wolfssl/wolfboot-ci Docker containers used in wolfBoot CI | Dockerfile | 0 |
| 28 | wolfssl/libXdmcp | 0 | |
| 29 | wolfssl/gnutls Mirror of official gnutls repository | C | 0 |
Total stars are useful as a discovery signal, but they do not tell you whether a team maintains every repository equally. Pair this page with release cadence, maintainer activity, and the flagship concentration shown above before making adoption decisions.
For broader background on GitStar's ranking logic and editorial guidance, see Methodology & Editorial Standards.