ethereum
@ethereum • Open source projects from ethereum. Use this route to separate flagship concentration from portfolio breadth before you treat a publisher as broadly strong.
Portfolio concentration
36%
Top three share
Shows whether the organization is driven by one breakout repo or several visible projects.
Breadth
30 repos
Visible snapshot
20 repositories updated in the last 90 days.
Leading language
Unknown
Portfolio mix
Unknown (5), Rust (4), TypeScript (4)
Average size
4
Stars per repository
Useful for distinguishing one flagship-heavy publisher from a repeatable portfolio.
Updated: 2026-08-28(7d ago)GitHub API fallback30 repositories
36%
of the visible star count comes from this organization's top three repositories.
4
stars per repository in this same snapshot.
Unknown
is the most common language here, with 20 repositories updated in the last 90 days.
Why this rank
This organization stands out because its public portfolio is relatively balanced across 30 repositories.
Balanced portfolio across 30 reposTop 3 share 36%
Organization pages work best when you separate portfolio breadth from flagship concentration. In ethereum's case, the visible top three repositories account for about 36% of total stars in this snapshot, which helps explain whether the organization is known for one breakout project or for a broader repeatable portfolio.
The dominant language mix here is Unknown (5), Rust (4), TypeScript (4). That makes this page useful not just for popularity checks, but also for seeing what technical shape an organization's public ecosystem actually has.
Top Repositories
| # | Repository | Language | Stars |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ethereum/spartan-whir | Rust | 16 |
| 2 | ethereum/epbs-security-analysis formal security analysis of the Enshrined Proposer-Builder Separation (ePBS) design introduced in EIP-7732 | 15 | |
| 3 | ethereum/speakup SpeakUp zkVM Website | 14 | |
| 4 | ethereum/state-actor | Go | 12 |
| 5 | ethereum/sol-spartan-whir Solidity verifier for the Spartan-WHIR SNARK over the KoalaBear field | Solidity | 8 |
| 6 | ethereum/private-transfers-benchmarks A set of adapters to run structured benchmarks for private transfers protocols | TypeScript | 8 |
| 7 | ethereum/ssz-specs Reference implementation of Ethereum SSZ serialization and Merkleization | Python | 7 |
| 8 | ethereum/clef clef tool | Go | 7 |
| 9 | ethereum/ZK-based-Proof-of-Personhood | 6 | |
| 10 | ethereum/zk-skills AI-friendly skills for EF / PSE Projects | Shell | 4 |
| 11 | ethereum/desktop-wallet | Rust | 3 |
| 12 | ethereum/anon-rpc | TypeScript | 3 |
| 13 | ethereum/kps Key Pinned Streams | Rust | 3 |
| 14 | ethereum/lean-multisig-bindings | Rust | 3 |
| 15 | ethereum/solidity-deposit-contract The deposit contract for Ethereum staking, written in Solidity | Solidity | 3 |
| 16 | ethereum/moica-revocation-smt Revocation lists in SMT that automatically update through CI/CI (both off-chain and on-chain) | Go | 3 |
| 17 | ethereum/app-enablement-resources Resources for the App Enablement team | 2 | |
| 18 | ethereum/builder-resources | JavaScript | 2 |
| 19 | ethereum/hid Gopher Interface Devices (USB HID) | C | 1 |
| 20 | ethereum/spec256k1 | Python | 1 |
| 21 | ethereum/strawmap Ethereum Strawmap — Draft Roadmap | HTML | 1 |
| 22 | ethereum/stateless-website | TypeScript | 1 |
| 23 | ethereum/buidl-landing Landing page for buidl.org | TypeScript | 1 |
| 24 | ethereum/issuance-forum | Astro | 1 |
| 25 | ethereum/stakemap-iframe redirect to google drawing | HTML | 1 |
| 26 | ethereum/finality-watch | CSS | 0 |
| 27 | ethereum/recursion-topology-fv | Lean | 0 |
| 28 | ethereum/repricing-impact Analyzes the gas and contract-failure impact of EVM gas repricings using historical mainnet replay data | Python | 0 |
| 29 | ethereum/tor-js-gateway | 0 | |
| 30 | ethereum/protocol-support-website Protocol Support website | HTML | 0 |
Next step after the organization read
Open a flagship repository, compare a couple of portfolio leaders, or return to the organization map when you want a broader concentration read.
Learn and methodology
Keep trust-building context reachable, but behind the first data read instead of ahead of it.
How to read this organization snapshot
Total stars are useful as a discovery signal, but they do not tell you whether a team maintains every repository equally. Pair this page with release cadence, maintainer activity, and the flagship concentration shown above before making adoption decisions.
For broader background on GitStar's ranking logic and editorial guidance, see Methodology & Editorial Standards.