Portfolio concentration
99%
Top three share
Shows whether the organization is driven by one breakout repo or several visible projects.
Breadth
30 repos
Visible snapshot
9 repositories updated in the last 90 days.
Leading language
Python
Portfolio mix
Python (12), Unknown (7), HTML (5)
Average size
1K
Stars per repository
Useful for distinguishing one flagship-heavy publisher from a repeatable portfolio.
99%
of the visible star count comes from this organization's top three repositories.
1K
stars per repository in this same snapshot.
Python
is the most common language here, with 9 repositories updated in the last 90 days.
Why this rank
This organization stands out because one flagship repo drives 99% of its visible star count.
Organization pages work best when you separate portfolio breadth from flagship concentration. In Harvard Edge Computing's case, the visible top three repositories account for about 99% of total stars in this snapshot, which helps explain whether the organization is known for one breakout project or for a broader repeatable portfolio.
The dominant language mix here is Python (12), Unknown (7), HTML (5). That makes this page useful not just for popularity checks, but also for seeing what technical shape an organization's public ecosystem actually has.
| # | Repository | Language | Stars |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | harvard-edge/cs249r_book Machine Learning Systems: Foundations, Scaling, Agentic AI, and Physical AI (Vols I–IV) • Harvard CS249r | https://mlsysbook.ai | Python | 29.7K |
| 2 | harvard-edge/multilingual_kws Few-shot Keyword Spotting in Any Language and Multilingual Spoken Word Corpus | Jupyter Notebook | 191 |
| 3 | harvard-edge/ML-Sensors | 35 | |
| 4 | harvard-edge/cs249r_book_dev Hosting the builds for the develop branch | HTML | 30 |
| 5 | harvard-edge/cs249r_fall2025 | Python | 25 |
| 6 | harvard-edge/Wake_Vision The code used to generate the Wake Vision dataset for person detection | Python | 17 |
| 7 | harvard-edge/dataperf-speech-example Example workflow for our data-centric speech benchmark | Python | 17 |
| 8 | harvard-edge/cs249r Repository for CS249r: Tiny Machine Learning | 16 | |
| 9 | harvard-edge/TinyML-Footprint | 13 | |
| 10 | harvard-edge/arch2 Architecture 2.0 public materials, including the synthesis lecture and preview site. | Python | 9 |
| 11 | harvard-edge/FlexiFlow | C | 9 |
| 12 | harvard-edge/physical-ai Physical AI Systems (Volume IV of Machine Learning Systems) has moved to https://mlsysbook.ai and https://github.com/harvard-edge/cs249r_book | Python | 7 |
| 13 | harvard-edge/Wake_Vision_Quickstart | Python | 4 |
| 14 | harvard-edge/Wake_Vision_Challenge_Data_Centric_Track | Python | 3 |
| 15 | harvard-edge/Wake_Vision_Challenge_Model_Centric_Track | Python | 3 |
| 16 | harvard-edge/Wake_Vision_Webpage A repository to host the source files for the wakevision.ai webpage | HTML | 3 |
| 17 | harvard-edge/wake_vision_challenge_2_data_centric_track | Python | 2 |
| 18 | harvard-edge/agentic-ai Agentic AI Systems (Volume III of Machine Learning Systems) • Harvard CS249r | https://mlsysbook.ai | 1 | |
| 19 | harvard-edge/arch2-seminar Website for Harvard Architecture 2.0 Seminar Series | SCSS | 1 |
| 20 | harvard-edge/lab | 1 | |
| 21 | harvard-edge/iiswc-26-arch-2-tutorial | HTML | 0 |
| 22 | harvard-edge/quarch-eval Evaluation harness for QuArch (ICML 2026) | Python | 0 |
| 23 | harvard-edge/arch2-dev | 0 | |
| 24 | harvard-edge/isca-26-arch-2-workshop | HTML | 0 |
| 25 | harvard-edge/asplos-26-arch-2-workshop | HTML | 0 |
| 26 | harvard-edge/wake_vision_challenge_2_model_centric_track | Python | 0 |
| 27 | harvard-edge/QuArch_Discussion | 0 | |
| 28 | harvard-edge/Architecture2_0 | CSS | 0 |
| 29 | harvard-edge/AVPerf | C++ | 0 |
| 30 | harvard-edge/tinyml_workspace | C++ | 0 |
Total stars are useful as a discovery signal, but they do not tell you whether a team maintains every repository equally. Pair this page with release cadence, maintainer activity, and the flagship concentration shown above before making adoption decisions.
For broader background on GitStar's ranking logic and editorial guidance, see Methodology & Editorial Standards.