Portfolio concentration
33%
Top three share
Shows whether the organization is driven by one breakout repo or several visible projects.
Breadth
30 repos
Visible snapshot
8 repositories updated in the last 90 days.
Leading language
Python
Portfolio mix
Python (10), Unknown (8), HTML (4)
Average size
20
Stars per repository
Useful for distinguishing one flagship-heavy publisher from a repeatable portfolio.
33%
of the visible star count comes from this organization's top three repositories.
20
stars per repository in this same snapshot.
Python
is the most common language here, with 8 repositories updated in the last 90 days.
Why this rank
This organization stands out because its visibility is spread across a broad portfolio of 30 repositories.
Organization pages work best when you separate portfolio breadth from flagship concentration. In Python Software Foundation's case, the visible top three repositories account for about 33% of total stars in this snapshot, which helps explain whether the organization is known for one breakout project or for a broader repeatable portfolio.
The dominant language mix here is Python (10), Unknown (8), HTML (4). That makes this page useful not just for popularity checks, but also for seeing what technical shape an organization's public ecosystem actually has.
| # | Repository | Language | Stars |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | psf/httpbin HTTP Request & Response Service, written in Python + Flask. | Python | 84 |
| 2 | psf/webassembly A repo to track the progress of Python on WebAssembly (WASM) | 61 | |
| 3 | psf/fundable-packaging-improvements Packaging improvements that could be funded | 58 | |
| 4 | psf/black-pre-commit-mirror | Python | 51 |
| 5 | psf/sboms-for-python-packages Software Bill-of-Materials documents for Python packages | Shell | 48 |
| 6 | psf/advisory-database This is a repository of vulnerability advisories for projects in scope for the Python Software Foundation CVE Numbering Authority (CNA) | Python | 48 |
| 7 | psf/gh-migration This repo is used to manage the migration from bugs.python.org to GitHub. | 46 | |
| 8 | psf/python-in-edu website for educational python resources | Python | 45 |
| 9 | psf/policies | Dockerfile | 30 |
| 10 | psf/bpo-tracker-cpython | Python | 28 |
| 11 | psf/project-funding-wg | 24 | |
| 12 | psf/diversity-and-inclusion-wg The Diversity and Inclusion Working Group is a volunteer workgroup of the Python Software Foundation. The workgroup's purpose is to further the PSF’s mission to ‘support and facilitate the growth of a diverse and international community of Python programmers.’ We also aim to provide guidance to the PSF Board of Directors in line with this mandate. | HTML | 18 |
| 13 | psf/user-success-wg Repository for the User Success working group at the Python Software Foundation | 13 | |
| 14 | psf/the-invisibles Pypodcats website | JavaScript | 13 |
| 15 | psf/organizer-toolkit An open-source kit for starting or improving your Python software community, conference, meetup, event etc.. | Just | 7 |
| 16 | psf/clabot Python Software Foundation Contributor License Agreement Management Bot | Python | 6 |
| 17 | psf/bpo-roundup | Python | 6 |
| 18 | psf/education-wg | 3 | |
| 19 | psf/wiki The Python Wiki | HTML | 2 |
| 20 | psf/infra Infrastructure as Code for the PSF | HCL | 2 |
| 21 | psf/fides-deploy PSFs Deployment of Fides | Python | 2 |
| 22 | psf/matterbridge-configuration PSF Hosted configuration for matterbridge instance | Shell | 2 |
| 23 | psf/bpo-django-gae2django | Python | 2 |
| 24 | psf/bpo-rietveld | Python | 2 |
| 25 | psf/bpo-tracker-jython | HTML | 2 |
| 26 | psf/bpo-tracker-roundup | HTML | 2 |
| 27 | psf/blog WIP Migration for PSF Blog from Blogger | Astro | 1 |
| 28 | psf/docker-mailman Dockerfiles for the Mailman suite. | 1 | |
| 29 | psf/packaging-wg | 1 | |
| 30 | psf/plausible-analytics Analytics for the Python Software Foundation. Powered by Plausible. | Elixir | 0 |
Total stars are useful as a discovery signal, but they do not tell you whether a team maintains every repository equally. Pair this page with release cadence, maintainer activity, and the flagship concentration shown above before making adoption decisions.
For broader background on GitStar's ranking logic and editorial guidance, see Methodology & Editorial Standards.