GitStar
TrendingExploreTop 100Insight
⌘K
GitStar

A ranking dashboard for GitHub momentum, durable repository leaders, package adoption, and editorial context.

Data source · GitHub API and package ecosystem snapshots

Home

HomeTrendingMomentumPulseExplore

Discover

CategoriesLanguagesOrganizationsAI / MLMCP

Workflow

CompareWatchlistRandom

Knowledge

InsightGuideMethodology

Support

FAQAbout GitStarContactPrivacyTerms

© 2026 GitStar. All rights reserved.

Data sourced from GitHub API

  1. Home
  2. Organizations
  3. Google
GoogleOrganization

Google

@google • Google Open Source projects. Use this route to separate flagship concentration from portfolio breadth before you treat a publisher as broadly strong.

Portfolio concentration

43%

Top three share

Shows whether the organization is driven by one breakout repo or several visible projects.

Breadth

10 repos

Visible snapshot

0 repositories updated in the last 90 days.

Leading language

C++

Portfolio mix

C++ (3), Various (2), CSS (1)

Average size

32K

Stars per repository

Useful for distinguishing one flagship-heavy publisher from a repeatable portfolio.

Back to organizationsCompare repositories
Static fallback snapshot10 repositories

Portfolio Shape

43%

of the visible star count comes from this organization's top three repositories.

Average Repository Size

32K

stars per repository in this same snapshot.

Current Mix

C++

is the most common language here, with 0 repositories updated in the last 90 days.

Why this rank

This organization stands out because its public portfolio is relatively balanced across 10 repositories.

Balanced portfolio across 10 reposTop 3 share 43%

Organization pages work best when you separate portfolio breadth from flagship concentration. In Google's case, the visible top three repositories account for about 43% of total stars in this snapshot, which helps explain whether the organization is known for one breakout project or for a broader repeatable portfolio.

The dominant language mix here is C++ (3), Various (2), CSS (1). That makes this page useful not just for popularity checks, but also for seeing what technical shape an organization's public ecosystem actually has.

Source: Static fallback snapshot. This is the same cache-first snapshot used by the organization ranking list, so the summary view and the detail view should stay aligned.

Top Repositories

#RepositoryLanguageStars🍴 ForksUpdated
1google/material-design-icons

Material Design Icons

CSS50K5KUnknown
2google/guava

Java core libraries

Java49K4.9KUnknown
3google/zx

Bash scripting in JS

JavaScript40K4KUnknown
4google/styleguide

Style guides

Various36K3.6KUnknown
5google/leveldb

Key-value storage

C++34K3.4KUnknown
6google/googletest

C++ testing framework

C++32K3.2KUnknown
7google/jax

ML research framework

Python27K2.7KUnknown
8google/mediapipe

ML solutions

C++25K2.5KUnknown
9google/fonts

Google Fonts

Various17K1.7KUnknown
10google/go-github

GitHub API client

Go10K1KUnknown

Next step after the organization read

Open a flagship repository, compare a couple of portfolio leaders, or return to the organization map when you want a broader concentration read.
Open flagship repoCompare repositoriesBack to organizations

Learn and methodology

Keep trust-building context reachable, but behind the first data read instead of ahead of it.
GuideMethodologyArticlesWeekly Digest

How to read this organization snapshot

Total stars are useful as a discovery signal, but they do not tell you whether a team maintains every repository equally. Pair this page with release cadence, maintainer activity, and the flagship concentration shown above before making adoption decisions.

For broader background on GitStar's ranking logic and editorial guidance, see Methodology & Editorial Standards.